Networking

    VXLAN IRB: symmetric vs asymmetric, when to use which

    TechLeague EditorialΒ·Β·4 min read

    VXLAN IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging) is how leaf switches route between VNIs. There are two flavors β€” choose wrong and you scale badly.

    What IRB actually is

    • Every leaf hosts an anycast gateway: same IP/MAC on every VTEP for a given VLAN.
    • Hosts always have a local default gateway β€” no hairpinning to a centralized router.
    • Inter-VNI routing happens at the ingress leaf when possible.

    Asymmetric IRB

    • Ingress leaf: route from source VNI directly into destination VNI, then bridge over VXLAN.
    • Egress leaf: bridge only β€” no route lookup.
    • Problem: every leaf must have every VNI configured, even VNIs with no local hosts.
    • Does not scale beyond small fabrics.

    Symmetric IRB

    • Ingress leaf: route into a special L3 VNI (one per VRF).
    • Egress leaf: route out of the L3 VNI into the destination VNI locally.
    • Same VNI used in both directions β€” hence "symmetric".
    • Win: leaves only need the VNIs they actually serve. Massively scalable.

    Why symmetric won

    • Smaller MAC/ARP tables per leaf.
    • Cleaner multi-tenancy via L3 VNI = VRF mapping.
    • Required by EVPN Type 5 (IP Prefix) routes.

    Vendor defaults

    • Cisco NX-OS, Arista EOS, Juniper Junos, Aruba CX β€” all default to symmetric.
    • If you see asymmetric in production, it is either legacy or a deliberate corner case.

    Practice IRB design choices in a TechLeague tournament.

    Related reading