Networking
VXLAN IRB: symmetric vs asymmetric, when to use which
TechLeague EditorialΒ·Β·4 min read
VXLAN IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging) is how leaf switches route between VNIs. There are two flavors β choose wrong and you scale badly.
What IRB actually is
- Every leaf hosts an anycast gateway: same IP/MAC on every VTEP for a given VLAN.
- Hosts always have a local default gateway β no hairpinning to a centralized router.
- Inter-VNI routing happens at the ingress leaf when possible.
Asymmetric IRB
- Ingress leaf: route from source VNI directly into destination VNI, then bridge over VXLAN.
- Egress leaf: bridge only β no route lookup.
- Problem: every leaf must have every VNI configured, even VNIs with no local hosts.
- Does not scale beyond small fabrics.
Symmetric IRB
- Ingress leaf: route into a special L3 VNI (one per VRF).
- Egress leaf: route out of the L3 VNI into the destination VNI locally.
- Same VNI used in both directions β hence "symmetric".
- Win: leaves only need the VNIs they actually serve. Massively scalable.
Why symmetric won
- Smaller MAC/ARP tables per leaf.
- Cleaner multi-tenancy via L3 VNI = VRF mapping.
- Required by EVPN Type 5 (IP Prefix) routes.
Vendor defaults
- Cisco NX-OS, Arista EOS, Juniper Junos, Aruba CX β all default to symmetric.
- If you see asymmetric in production, it is either legacy or a deliberate corner case.
Practice IRB design choices in a TechLeague tournament.